- Feel free to go anywhere you want. A 24MP Fuji full frame X100 would not have to play in RX1 or Q2 pricing waters. Why do you use FF cameras then? They own APSC (the sweet spot) and MF (the high-end of photography). There's a reason why 1/8000 is a standard. It’s a more minor gripe but is something that always crops up when I’m out in the wild. A pity, as my tiny and light vintage Zuiko lenses are some of my greatest legacy treasures. Introduction Images Technik Analysis Recommendations This all-content, junk-free website's biggest source of support is when you use any of these links to approved sources when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. The new wave of mirrorless full-frame cameras led by the likes of the Nikon Z7 may have grabbed recent headlines, but the impressive Fujifilm X-T3 … Thanks for helping me help you! 5 months ago permalink. Take a closer look. Fujifilm cannot command that sort of premium price. The viewfinder has the same specs as the Fuji X-T2 with a higher resolution and is still buttery smooth and seems nearly real-time. "- Then why don't make a "camera" with say 9 giant pixels (3x3) that would have multiple times higher DR and enjoy its image quality? Let's play nice.I linked to some samples to show that FF lenses don't vignette on 44x33. Other than this one instance, I was completely impressed with the build, gripes and all. So it was like lightning strike in the middle of the room. It doesn't matter how much light comes from the lens if your tiny little sensor cannot gather as much light as the larger sensor. Even though I love having my ISO and Shutter Speed controls out in the open and not buried deep in menus, I also ran into the classic Fuji problem of a few too many things being relegated to dials such as shooting options like bracketing, dual exposure, panoramic, video, and even metering. Not One Thing. Weight: 20.6 oz. But we strongly suspect that Fujifilm will never do it. I can, without a doubt say I’m not disappointed. Do the math. No they don't. In which full frames are with the size 36x24. The camera even handled the nasty weather really well. ”I see no reason for APC-C users to be annoyed if Fuji makes a FF body.”. Fujifilm X-T4 Alternatives in Mirrorless cameras with Full Frame. Just use your full frame stuff which is fine for you so no problem though all this passion over what other people do contrary to your particular view of the world is interesting in many ways. At that point, there's no advantage to the smaller formats. Yeahh, just go and get it! I agree that Canon video is generally not good enough IMO for hybrid cameras. Leica buyers are generally fetishists, not photographers!! This kind of philosophy is what’s getting tired. It is impossible to disagree with your statement more. :), You said "Photography isn't art, photography isn't a profession. !35mm sensor format is much worse for macro. I told them 800 times starting the moment the XT-3 came out that if they didn't figure out a way to get IBIS in the XT-4 they were in trouble. Just out shooting a Canon M6 today in comparison with a Z6 as I like the small size with the EF-M 22mm f2.0 and the vertical selfie. This is not borderless printing! Let me start by saying that I had honestly never even considered switching back to an APS-C format camera or even to Fujifilm for that matter until a few months ago. Or if you want you can provide MF camera for better quality, because we need to print billboards with 1000DPI. I too believe that X100 cameras, are of poor quality (image wise). Gear can be a hobby. Well done ! Rank in All Cameras: #2 Rank in Mirrorless Cameras: #2. Fixed lens digital cameras have a five year shelf life with no resale value at the end. so we get a cute flip screen with a nostalgia feature. Doh - who'da thought someone else would do digital when Kodak didn't? Maybe DPR staff are self isolating and running out of ideas. I guess that's why Yashica T4's are going for $$$.An inexpensive, small full frame alternative would be to buy a Ricoh FF-90 camera for under $100.Then you have more than $900 leftover to spend on film and processing. The A7c costs about the same as the XT4 and is both smaller and lighter than the XT4. “ image quality” is banded around but it is meaningless. If you’re happy with APS-C, you’re already in really good shape for lens selection. If I'm going to carry heavy gear or pay a pretty penny, I want gear which will perform. The main Fuji designer said, on record, that they potentially could make a X100 camera of a similar size to the existing, with a FF sensor, but not IBIS - as that would significantly change the size of the X100. Market is so saturated that as previous Full Frame Canon, Nikon, Sony owner and now i have T3...if i want Full Frame system i will go buy one... Barney, Good article. Basically all modern cameras can take great pics, the one-stop DoF advantage or clean 750000 ISO are irrelevant. (Ideally with a 24mp or less bsi bayer sensor optimized for low light shooting). No my friend you are talking total mess! And I have cameras from several sensor sizes from my iPhone to 1”, m43, APS-C, APS-H, and FF. @ecka84 - With all possible good feelings - PLEASE MAKE UP YOUR MIND! And also Sigma which is alive because of many years selling by filling the APS-C lenses OEM holes, now focusing on overcrowded 35mm market............ Do you need more examples where 35mm is worse, impossible or much more expensive?What about 4K video? Tons of "FF vs crop myth busted camera", but in reality, there is a difference, and it’s not (only) about high iso noise. This camera segment is dead. Senior Editor Barney Britton's Gear of the Year part two details how he ended up with a Reflex-Nikkor 1000mm F11, and despite its quirks, why it was ideal for a creative project in the COVID-era. No disrespect, but I don’t understand your thought process. Exactly as APS-C and 4/3. Wise decision to remain on APS-C, as compact as possible. This 1" in latest RX cameras is ultra fast, optics is relatively sharp but not fast enough. The camera would sell, no doubt, because it would be well created. We reviewed the X-T30 with the recently-released XF 16mm … That was one of their biggest challenges. An extra stop of performance is all that a big thing to drool upon destroying the harmony of what the X100 is? "So both systems are directly inherited by film standards and replaced by them. They fight me and don’t disappear in the way the others do - they have great tech but Sony don’t take user experience seriously enough. Sigma has introduced its new 'I series' of compact, premium full-frame lenses for E and L mounts. Fujifilm's 3.00 firmware update adds a new Pixel Shift Mult-Shot mode to its GFX 100 camera that works alongside a new Pixel Shift Combiner program to output 400MP Raw images made up from 16 individual still images. This holding back of technology and evolution in the camera industry is whats will kill it. What’s the best camera for less than $1000? Just googled that. Remember this and do not be "not-scientific" anymore!About sensor size standard which current senor inherit is 35mm. :)You really think that current OK-cameras will never end-up in junk stores or eBay for $20? Even the old EF lenses work on GFX cameras (adapted) with no vignetting. It should come as no surprise that the image quality is as I’ve come to expect from Fuji. Compare red to arri in cine cameras. still waiting for X40, smaller sensor, maybe m4/3 or 1 inch but rugged build, decent zoom range. Now we see more and more "why I'm ditching Fuji for FF" videos :).Of course, the pseudo-medium format is even better, but, realistically, it's still too expensive. Nikon's long-awaited launch into the full-frame mirrorless market has been setting the benchmark for the future of photography. one could believe that camera manufacturers would lead the the evolution of the camera industry, not smartphone companies! But, if you insist, I must point out that there are no native GF F1.2 or F1.4 lenses to talk about. The Leica Q2 Monochrom is a version of the Gold Award-winning Q2 that only shoots images in black and white. Not enough nits to be anything else than dirty paper compared to a HR screen that does not fake effects. I don't own a X100, but I do know the best handphone are not comparable to even the 1" sensors. Unfortunately, it attracts all sort of ignorant gear fetishists, who deny any connections between the gear and the images. I'm happy with my APS-C X100, don't change a thing. I love that I can still shoot with one hand and not feel my arm burning (This has more to do with the lens choice, but even a Canon 5D Mark IV is a weight with a pancake lens). For hybrid, the Z6 is so far ahead of Fujifilm APS-C for stills detail and colour at high ISO, the slight sacrifice in video quality is more than worth it (for me). Some would call that slow-motion to one eighth the speed of a … Essentially, this is my idea of a final verdict adding all of these things together and asking whether I enjoyed my time with the camera. 1" and you can put a fast zoom on it at so I think the market for a fixed lens 1" would not really be there. Finally some good news, thank to FujiFilm and the doctors testing it. It’s not without its faults but you can tell there has been a lot of thought poured into this camera and it shows in how well the sensor renders images whether it is in photo or video. This is in any condition with any lens does not matter what you do you get 1 stop more?!?! While crop alternatives either do not exist or are even more expensive than FF.I'm not suggesting that everyone has to switch to FF. I'm so sick of maintaining multiple systems I just want to have a single set of lenses and single mount and single battery size. Low light is where things get more complicated. Oh, and it's a lot of fun too. Great stills, cracking video and beautiful design – the X-T30 is a little gem. @DaftPunk The feel and process with a camera are important to me. Hi, a FF (Kleinbild) X100 does not make much sense, the market and my equipment being as it is, with 2 Leica M9s and over 30 Leica M mount lenses. :). Black and white only versions of anything must have a very limited market and very much for the Leica zone of users and probably does need to cost what they charge to get a return. You have the links above and you can start educating yourself if you want. "There is no 35mm sensor with electronic shutter with speed 1/32000"- True. We need cheaper, much bigger and simple storage and share concepts than what the cloud can provide. :). I remember dreaming of that beautiful full frame camera, being overjoyed the day I finally could upgrade, and don’t get me wrong, I still LOVE that camera, but not all the time. The video quality takes a … A more promising road for Fuji to take is joining the L mount grouping and make a FF (Kleinbild) body. This has always been the Achilles heel of the system in my opinion and is still here. What is annoying are people saying over and over again that ”Fuji should make a FF body” when Fuji already said it will never be one. The X-T2 uses Fujifilm’s latest 24-megapixel, X … Removing and reinserting the battery fixed the issue. I want that camera with a first rate lens but not at over $2000 pricing. A body and a few lenses will be a $10,000 investment. While a little muddy in detail, the jpeg compression still holds up under scrutiny. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that might be a bit older but still offer a lot of bang for the buck. In a year when social distancing became a way of life overnight, Senior Editor Barney Britton maintained a small sense of connection via the Fujifilm X100V. This are simple things need to be able to remember them.FF Superior to what? The rest of us that might actually utilise high resolution print already have a plethora of choice. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Many cameras can only do 1/4000 (including the X100), which is not great and a PITA, because it forces us to use ND (or CPL) filters. The fun film simulations and great image quality combine to make a pleasant shooting experience especially combined with the manual controls. ", https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1382037-REG/techart_pro_6900527095463_canon_to_fujifilm_gfx.html/overview, Right ... and the 8-16L vignettes even on FF ...It's an ultra-wide, what did you expect? Those days are gone. A full frame sensor is 24x36mm, whereas the APS-C sensor is roughly 16x24mm. I would love a Nikon full frame Leica Q2 type camera. The new DJI Mavic Mini 2 includes several notable improvements over the original Mavic Mini, including 4K video, Raw photo capability, and DJI's robust OcuSync 2.0 transmission system. Now, if YOU need a FF camera in order to get a decent photograph (like if all FF images were good) then the problem is you, not the camera. "hardly noticeable in prints" - You must be printing postage stamps. I've shot M43 (not much of it, awful format), APS-C (Fuji and Sony) and full frame (Canon, Sony, Nikon). I actually need full frame for certain applications but it’s certainly not always the best tool for the job. It’s like I stumbled onto buzzfeed or something. Look at the images and stop denying reality. don’t understand the whole debacle about full frame being better. Continue..........But not with 8 bit crippled video.And not on this ridiculous price! What's missing is an AFFORDABLE compact digital FF camera with COMPACT exchangeable lenses. Sony A7R IV Compare X-T4 vs A7R IV: 61 MP | Full frame BSI-CMOS Sensor Sony E Mount. "a substitute for any real substance in the argument" - Because you just skip all of the "real substance" and go straight to polemic. After so many years of Fujifilm reps bashing FF and spreading lies about it, it would be rather disgraceful to start making FF cameras all of a sudden :)). Hyped on the V for weather sealing.. but there are more than occasional reports of overheating issues. Remember, it wasn’t very long ago that cameras like the D700 and D610 were touted as pro gear capable of capturing amazing pictures, and modern Fujifilm … I don't think it's hard to see which would have the greater mass appeal. Very funny reading comments like that: « I would love that camera and buy it right away if it was completely different ». Does my light meter compensate for sensor size? Your mileage may vary. It had the best-looking quality to my eyes as well and was the way I wanted to remember my trip. You need larger medium to receive 35mm FRAME! Unlike practically every other camera maker, Fujifilm does not make full frame cameras. The BS is in the contradiction. People buy what fits their needs and budgets. "And what about this 1 stop light?!?! So, there would be enough lenses even at the beginning. So ecka84 - you know no way to talk too much without say something totally wrong!So from technical and scientific point of view sensor is not able to provide more or less light. "If you are a photographer who doesn't care about the image, then really any camera will do"Here, I fixed it for you. "Tell me now why I need to go 35mm or bigger?" "No I am not using 1/32000 because my camera does not support it! This is important if you're looking for that blurry background. Like that https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/3827214348/albums/negligible-1600-400andhttps://www.dpreview.com/galleries/3827214348/albums/ff-vs-crop. Only Full Frame with 40+ megapixles make sense and for smaller bodies - Sigma Foveon cameras and Ricoh GR II/III. Crippled video is why I don't shoot Canon any more (got tired of carrying second set of gear and maintaining a second set of lenses to shoot video). FF will replace the APS-C and MFT.